The Comm and Gender Spot

Tuesday, September 26, 2006

Not Cancelled...Yet!

The new television season has barely gotten underway. Some new and returning programs have yet to even premiere their first episode of the season. Even considering that, for some network executives it isn’t too early to deal with programs that are underperforming.

Word came recently that FOX is pulling its new Thursday night comedy Happy Hour.

Happy Hour has not been able to hold on to much of the audience watching ‘Til Death, the sitcom airing just before it.

FOX insists that the show has not been cancelled. In fact, it is penciled in to return November 2nd for November sweeps. But being pulled for a full month after only three episodes isn’t a good sign. It seems very likely that Happy Hour won’t last into 2007.

Monday, September 25, 2006

That Explains A Lot

I saw the following comic strip today. It sure does explain to me a lot about the cars featured and those that own them.

Saturday, September 23, 2006

Ten Years and Still Going

I remember about ten years ago moving to Indiana. The night before leaving I was in a room at the Motel 6 in Rochester, New York having just had the movers leave my apartment with all of my belongings. As I was settling in for bed I turned on the TV and tuned in to Comedy Central. As it turns out I got the opportunity to watch the premiere episode of a pop culture phenomenon not seen before.

I got to watch the premiere of South Park.

I thought the cartoon was crude, both in its language and in its animation. But there was something ultimately funny at its core. I tuned in each and every week during the first season just to see not only what Stan, Kyle and Cartman would get into that week but to also see how Kenny would die. It was often a laugh riot well worth the thirty minutes I’d spend watching it.

Not ever episode was a classic. Some were real clunkers. But when South Park was on, it was hilarious. No group or topic is too taboo. Creators Trey Parker and Matt Stone have taken on Scientology, Mormons, homosexuality, and the 2000 Presidential election among other things. And all were handled with South Park’s usual hilarity.

South Park has also been recognized in the entertainment community, including winning an Emmy and being nominated for an Academy Award for the South Park movie, South Park: Bigger, Longer and Uncut.

We are now coming up on the show’s 10th season. I encourage all that have not yet given this show a chance and have as much fun as the show’s current loyal viewers.

Wednesday, September 13, 2006

Something We Should All Read

In the past I've stated that I try to keep political matters out of this space. Politics are a touchy and highly divisive topic, and I don't want the content of this blog to be the catalyst for any controversy among my friends and family that reads it. That being said, a couple of times over the past year some political news has crept in, both in my response to recent happenings and others' research in the field.

With this preface, I now feel compelled to reprint a commentary from newsman Keith Olbermann that he gave on Monday, the fifth anniversary of 9/11. While I don't always agree with what Mr. Olbermann says, when I saw this on Monday it touched me in ways that I didn't realize were possible. It really did sum up much of my frustration over the current state of American politics in the wake of these tragedies, and what has happened over the last five years. My only hope is that be reprinting it here, taken word for word from the yahoo news story where I found the transcript, it touches someone else the way it did me.

Half a lifetime ago, I worked in this now-empty space. And for 40 days after the attacks, I worked here again, trying to make sense of what happened, and was yet to happen, as a reporter.

All the time, I knew that the very air I breathed contained the remains of thousands of people, including four of my friends, two in the planes and -- as I discovered from those "missing posters" seared still into my soul -- two more in the Towers.

And I knew too, that this was the pyre for hundreds of New York policemen and firemen, of whom my family can claim half a dozen or more, as our ancestors.

I belabor this to emphasize that, for me this was, and is, and always shall be, personal.

And anyone who claims that I and others like me are "soft,"or have "forgotten" the lessons of what happened here is at best a grasping, opportunistic, dilettante and at worst, an idiot whether he is a commentator, or a Vice President, or a President.

However, of all the things those of us who were here five years ago could have forecast -- of all the nightmares that unfolded before our eyes, and the others that unfolded only in our minds -- none of us could have predicted this.

Five years later this space is still empty.

Five years later there is no memorial to the dead.

Five years later there is no building rising to show with proud defiance that we would not have our America wrung from us, by cowards and criminals.

Five years later this country's wound is still open.

Five years later this country's mass grave is still unmarked.

Five years later this is still just a background for a photo-op.

It is beyond shameful.

At the dedication of the Gettysburg Memorial -- barely four months after the last soldier staggered from another Pennsylvania field -- Mr. Lincoln said, "we cannot dedicate, we cannot consecrate, we cannot hallow this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract."

Lincoln used those words to immortalize their sacrifice.

Today our leaders could use those same words to rationalize their reprehensible inaction. "We cannot dedicate, we can not consecrate, we can not hallow this ground." So we won't.

Instead they bicker and buck pass. They thwart private efforts, and jostle to claim credit for initiatives that go nowhere. They spend the money on irrelevant wars, and elaborate self-congratulations, and buying off columnists to write how good a job they're doing instead of doing any job at all.

Five years later, Mr. Bush, we are still fighting the terrorists on these streets. And look carefully, sir, on these 16 empty acres. The terrorists are clearly, still winning.

And, in a crime against every victim here and every patriotic sentiment you mouthed but did not enact, you have done nothing about it.

And there is something worse still than this vast gaping hole in this city, and in the fabric of our nation. There is its symbolism of the promise unfulfilled, the urgent oath, reduced to lazy execution.

The only positive on 9/11 and the days and weeks that so slowly and painfully followed it was the unanimous humanity, here, and throughout the country. The government, the President in particular, was given every possible measure of support.

Those who did not belong to his party -- tabled that.

Those who doubted the mechanics of his election -- ignored that.

Those who wondered of his qualifications -- forgot that.

History teaches us that nearly unanimous support of a government cannot be taken away from that government by its critics. It can only be squandered by those who use it not to heal a nation's wounds, but to take political advantage.

Terrorists did not come and steal our newly-regained sense of being American first, and political, fiftieth. Nor did the Democrats. Nor did the media. Nor did the people.

The President -- and those around him -- did that.

They promised bi-partisanship, and then showed that to them, "bi-partisanship" meant that their party would rule and the rest would have to follow, or be branded, with ever-escalating hysteria, as morally or intellectually confused, as appeasers, as those who, in the Vice President's words yesterday, "validate the strategy of the terrorists."

They promised protection, and then showed that to them "protection" meant going to war against a despot whose hand they had once shaken, a despot who we now learn from our own Senate Intelligence Committee, hated al-Qaida as much as we did.

The polite phrase for how so many of us were duped into supporting a war, on the false premise that it had 'something to do' with 9/11 is "lying by implication."

The impolite phrase is "impeachable offense."

Not once in now five years has this President ever offered to assume responsibility for the failures that led to this empty space, and to this, the current, curdled, version of our beloved country.

Still, there is a last snapping flame from a final candle of respect and fairness: even his most virulent critics have never suggested he alone bears the full brunt of the blame for 9/11.

Half the time, in fact, this President has been so gently treated, that he has seemed not even to be the man most responsible for anything in his own administration.

Yet what is happening this very night?

A mini-series, created, influenced -- possibly financed by -- the most radical and cold of domestic political Machiavellis, continues to be televised into our homes.

The documented truths of the last fifteen years are replaced by bald-faced lies; the talking points of the current regime parroted; the whole sorry story blurred, by spin, to make the party out of office seem vacillating and impotent, and the party in office, seem like the only option.

How dare you, Mr. President, after taking cynical advantage of the unanimity and love, and transmuting it into fraudulent war and needless death, after monstrously transforming it into fear and suspicion and turning that fear into the campaign slogan of three elections? How dare you -- or those around you -- ever "spin" 9/11?

Just as the terrorists have succeeded -- are still succeeding -- as long as there is no memorial and no construction here at Ground Zero.

So, too, have they succeeded, and are still succeeding as long as this government uses 9/11 as a wedge to pit Americans against Americans.

This is an odd point to cite a television program, especially one from March of 1960. But as Disney's continuing sell-out of the truth (and this country) suggests, even television programs can be powerful things.

And long ago, a series called "The Twilight Zone" broadcast a riveting episode entitled "The Monsters Are Due On Maple Street."

In brief: a meteor sparks rumors of an invasion by extra-terrestrials disguised as humans. The electricity goes out. A neighbor pleads for calm. Suddenly his car -- and only his car -- starts. Someone suggests he must be the alien. Then another man's lights go on. As charges and suspicion and panic overtake the street, guns are inevitably produced. An "alien" is shot -- but he turns out to be just another neighbor, returning from going for help. The camera pulls back to a near-by hill, where two extra-terrestrials are seen manipulating a small device that can jam electricity. The veteran tells his novice that there's no need to actually attack, that you just turn off a few of the human machines and then, "they pick the most dangerous enemy they can find, and it's themselves."

And then, in perhaps his finest piece of writing, Rod Serling sums it up with words of remarkable prescience, given where we find ourselves tonight: "The tools of conquest do not necessarily come with bombs and explosions and fallout. There are weapons that are simply thoughts, attitudes, prejudices, to be found only in the minds of men.

"For the record, prejudices can kill and suspicion can destroy, and a thoughtless, frightened search for a scapegoat has a fallout all its own -- for the children, and the children yet unborn."

When those who dissent are told time and time again -- as we will be, if not tonight by the President, then tomorrow by his portable public chorus -- that he is preserving our freedom, but that if we use any of it, we are somehow un-American...When we are scolded, that if we merely question, we have "forgotten the lessons of 9/11"... look into this empty space behind me and the bi-partisanship upon which this administration also did not build, and tell me:

Who has left this hole in the ground?

We have not forgotten, Mr. President.

You have.

May this country forgive you.

Quick Note

I just wanted to write a quick note to let everyone know that I haven't forgotten about my blog. I've been incredibly busy as of late. Between teaching, getting a draft of my proposal in to my advisor Dr. Julie Fox, and preparing materials for the job market, I haven't had much time to breathe let alone write a blog entry.

I do promise to work my blog back into my regular schedule very, very soon!

Tuesday, September 05, 2006

Teaching-Take Two

After last week when I gave a horrible first lecture I worked hard to improve. I spoked with a few faculty members here in the Department of Telecommunications in an attempt to better understand the material that I was covering and to make my presentation of the material more engaging.

Last night I gave another lecture and it went much better. I have pretty high standards for myself, and I still do not believe that I am at the level that I should be. (I know that sometimes I talk too fast and have to work on that.) However, after last night's class, I feel that I now have the potential to succeed as a teacher and actually teach these students something useful.

Friday, September 01, 2006

Teaching is Hard

I started as the instructor of record for my first class ever this week. I am teaching a section TEL T348, otherwise known as Audience Analysis.

This first day we did the basic things that virtually every class does the first day. I handed out the syllabus, told my students about me and my class, and then let them go. The real test was what happened on day two.

I gave my first lecture this past Wednesday. It was horrible. I couldn't find my rhythm. I went way too fast and had some of my students turn against me the first day. I felt ridiculous and like I did not belong there.

I now know what I did wrong. I'm going to work next week at making good with my students and make my future lectures better. I'm hoping that my students will allow me a fresh start and not hold the travesty that was my last lecture against me.

Wish me luck!